The Christian and Life Insurance
                                                                                                     by
                                                                                          Dallas M. Roark

        Mac, here's the story," said Don  Anders. The insurance agent moved  to the edge of his easy chair in the comfortable living room, eager to make his appeal effective. "With these small children, a new home, and all, you can't afford to be without insurance. It is just not good business. What would Helen do if you were not around to pro­vide for her and the children?"
        Mac stared at the rug into the un
known future.
        "Think of the youngsters," the agent pushed his persuasive points. "Think of their education! What will become of them if you should be taken?"
        Helen looked at Mac. It was his decision, yet it was important to her also, for it involved the family in both its present and its future.
        Mac nodded. It all added up-the uncertainty of life, the unknown future, the appeal of investment-all added up to the need for life insurance. But what of his Christian faith? Was insurance incompatible with faith and absolute dependence on God?
        What about such verses as "Take no thought for your life, what ye shall eat, or what ye shall drink; nor yet for your body, what ye shall put on ... take, therefore, no thought for the morrow" (Matt. 6:25-34)? What need is there of insurance when "God shall supply all your need according to his riches in glory by Christ Jesus" (Phil. 4:19)? Are we not admonished to be continually "casting all your care upon him; for he careth for you" (I Pet. 5: 7) ?
          Mac is only one of many Christians who face this problem. How are others answering the question? How do pastors, teachers, laymen and missionaries re­gard this matter of life insurance--or of insurance of any kind, for that matter? I made a limited survey on the subject which included individuals in these callings and vocations. Its limita­tions are admitted, but the conclusions, I believe, are typical.
         Before going further into the question, let's define insurance. Insurance involves the payment of premiums for the guar­antee of reimbursement in the event of a given loss, either by fire, accident, death, etc. Life insurance guarantees the beneficiary a payment of a set sum in the event of the death of the insured.
         There are at least two basic types of life insurance. First there is the simple life insurance plan which provides protection only. With this, protection for a man's family in case of his death is all that he has-- though he may pay premiums all his life.
        The purchaser of such insurance is merely paying into a supervised special fund in return for the promise that  though he cannot lay down a sufficient sum to protect his family in case of his death, the fund will do so for the limited number of contributors who will die within the period covered.
        On the other hand, there is the type of plan which in addition to providing life insurance offers the opportunity for investment to care for future needs. It has different names according to policy provisions, such as "twenty-year payment life," "endowment plan" and the "annuity plans."
        These plans and policies offer both protection and cash surrender value according to policy provisions. In the better policies. dividends make it possible to receive considerably more money in cash than was paid in. This type is decidedly the better from a Christian point of view of stewardship.
        But an important problem remains when you look at these forms of insur­ance which are essentially savings for providing security. Is a man's insurancE reasonable provision for the futurE within the framework of Christian 'duty  or a confession of a lack of faith in the provision of God?
        BASICALLY, insurance is only one of several ways of providing security agaist calamity. Many depend on a savings account or' a farm, securities or commodities. But the question remain: when I turn to any of these--and insurance has become one of the most common provIsIons for security--am I turning away from dependence on God?
        George Muller would say so. This serv­ant of God of the last century (1805-­98) was a well-known proponent of dependence on God apart from any such financial provisions. He undertook to show to the world that the promises of God are positive and valid today.
        By prayer alone he looked to God to provide for his daily needs. When it came to building up a fund to provide security against the day of frailty and old age, Muller said. "No!" To George Muller the accumulation of such a fund was storing up treasure on earth. There was one investment with the promised dividend of God: "He that hath pity upon the poor lendeth unto the Lord; and that which he hath given will he pay him again" (Prov. 19:17).
        There is a school of political and eco­nomic thought that objects to life insurance purely on an economic basis. It is pointed out that due to the fluctuation of the dollar and its decreasing value life insurance is not as good an investment as it once was.
        I assume those who hold this view would advise other investments which would keep pace with the dollar value. However, it would appear that they are not against insurance as such, but speak only from the standpoint of investment under current conditions.
        Someone has charged that life insurance is really a matter of gambling with one's life. A Christian insurance man, in reference to this said, "A certain number of people will die each year. Regardless of whether they are good or bad this is the order of nature. Gambling, on the other hand, is a creating of chance,"
        He went on to explain, "You don't have to pick up the dice; you choose to, thereby creating the possibility of win­ning or losing. An insurance policy does not change a person's life expectancy. Furthermore, there is the savings aspect which is a definite attraction."
        From time to time some have objected that families should care for their own dependents. But the overwhelming majority of bereaved dependents, when given the choice between living with sons and daughters or brothers and sisters and that of being financially independent, would choose the latter . Without overlooking the thousands of bereaved dependents who live with their families in happiness, a "third" party usually does not foster complete harmony. Furthermore, those who hold this objection overlook the matter of stewardship which we will be speaking' of further along.
        In the course of my survey, I found  only three who really opposed life insurance for the Christian in principle. A pastor who felt his views were still in th the process of taking shape said, "I believe we are living in a day when Christians as well as unbelievers are becoming over-burdened with various forms of security plans."  
         A young lady missionary to Africa  said, "I would take these verses [quotedl here earlier] literally, and include  insurance in the category of non-dependence on God."
         Again, a farmer in California does not  think that a Christian should have life  insurance, but he does not consider the fact that his farm is worth thirty thouand dollars, and that the security provided by it affects his viewpoint.
         The fact is, the overwhelming majority in the survey spoke up for life insurance. In most cases direct scriptural support  was given or inferred. One pastor suggested, "We have to look at these verses in the light of the rest of the Bible."

    Analying my survey, I have come to the following conclusions.
        1. Mutual concern and provision is a Christian attituide. 
        One man, a professor of Bible, pointed to the patriarchial system  of the Old Testament  as being something of a mutual insurance company. Mutual insurance or provision comes about when a group of people pool their premiums, and any claims are drawn from the common fund of money. The patriarchial family, joined either by birth, marriage or servitude, pooled their resources and members cared for each othcr in sickness, provided for the disabled and sustained .the elderly.
         Another Biblical practice could also be called a form of insurance. This was the custom of the ancient Jews by which a dead man's brother was obligated to marry the widow, if there were no sons (Duet. 25 :5-10).
         The dean of a certain school suggested that the basic principles of the mutual insurance movement have their roots in Acts 6 where the deacons were chosen to care for the widows. The communal living and the relief offerings of the book of Acts again express their mutual sharing in the time of need.
        One pastor put it this way: "I believe God uses insurance. to meet the needs of His children. He will surely supply all needs but he expects us to do all we can." Then he made the pointed observation that if the Lord is to supply our needs, there must be some means: if there is no provision, that means will be our friends, relatives or some agency.
        2. Provision for the future is taught in' Scripture.
        In the survey, many expressed their  attitude toward life insurance as being  similar to those words of the wise man:
"Go to the ant, thou sluggard; consider her ways, and be wise: which having no guide, overseer, or ruler, provideth her meat in the summer, and gathereth her  food in the harvest" (Prov. 6:6-8).
        A Christian layman, who is a foreman  in a large industry, replied to my questionnaire: "It is my conviction that after we give to God what is rightly His, it isl our responsibility, working with Him, to invest what we have left to help us financially in our retiring years and ease  expenses left by death. I do not believe  that God intended for us to sit back and  say, 'You, Lord, owe me a living.' Instead, we should plan ahead. "I am paid monthly," this man continued, " and I have to plan ahead for  food to last till the end of the following  month. I believe God intends for me to  plan for today and for the future. But I  must never let this interfere with my proper stewardship to God."
        3. Total stewardship requires provision  loved ones. 
        Good stewardship requires insurance   or some other form of provision for the f'uture. A state Christian education director put it this way: "Stewardship includes not only money but a wife and  children who are gifts from the Lord. It is therefore my responsibility, as a good steward of all that God has given me, to provide for my family upon my death  or retirement."
        A Christian life insurance agent spoke strongly in this matter of stewardship. He desired to place the responsibilities of man and God in their proper h place.  "The Christian who does not believe in s life insurance," he said, " is like the one
who does not believe in taking aspirin  for headaches, or seeing the doctor for  sickness and other established remedies  for the solution of certain problems. There are special cases, of course, in which the Lord providentially provides benefits for the individual, but these are only when the normal channels cannot help."
        Non-provision for one's 'Ioved ones actually is as bad as infidelity. A Bible teaches gave this analysis: "The Chris­tian's attitude toward life insurance should be that of providing; for there are scriptures that say a man is to pro­vide for his household. This is not be­littling the power of the Lord. He has never told us to sit back and relax and receive. Work is a blessing'."
        Paul wrote to Timothy: "But if any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel" Cl Tim. 5:8) .

       The problem which most people like Mac and Helen face is that they think they have to decide between trusting God on the one hand and providing for the future on the other. The majority of those quoted see provision for the future as an obligation.
        True, there is a danger of making a provision for the future in the spirit of the man in Luke 12, who tries to build such a high wall of security that he does not have to trust God. This of course is a sin and outside the area of Christian faith.
        There should be no real conflict between our trust in God and our providing for the future. God has promised to supply all our need, but that provision includes the natural means of giving us bodies capable of work and minds capa­ble of planning.
        We must exercise stewardship in our money, in our time and in life itself. In my judgment, insurance, for the Christian, seems to be intimately related to all three. END


    (This article appeared in the January 1958 issue of Moody Monthly )